How the Music Business Spent the Summer Killing Itself... r.e.c.a.p.

Sorry. Hello World. I owe an apology it seems. In the past two whirl-wind months, I have been an absentee landlord with "Is This Binding?". Work has been killing me it seems and when I haven't been at work, I have been out at the lake enjoying what is left of my summer.

To anyone who cares, I must say I'm Sorry.

Now on with the good stuff..

I just received this off of the "Pho" mailing list... really good stuff from "Advertising Age" of all places... The title says it all and Simon Dumenco really is beating a dead horse with his commentary here... but it is nice to hear someone else say it in a new venue... Hopefully, Muxtape will find a way through the RIAA BS in time to actually come back and do some good things. God knows they had a great underground following. As for Pandora, I am afraid I am going to miss it quite a bit once it is gone. I dont know how they can possibly hang on with the terms of the licenses they will need looming overhead.

http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=130766

So Without further adieu:

How the Music Business Spent the Summer Killing Itself Labels Pull Albums off iTunes, RIAA Goes After Internet Radio -- When Will They Ever Learn?

By Simon Dumenco

Published: September 08, 2008 A few weeks back, as I was having dinner with a media-industry colleague at a trendy restaurant in a trendy New York neighborhood, I realized that the music coming over the sound system was transporting me to another time -- specifically, 1986. As song after song by various "it" bands of the moment, such as Black Kids and the Virgins, played, it was as if we were listening to a time-warped or parallel-universe version of the "Pretty in Pink" soundtrack. Because really, the "it" sound of the moment would work seamlessly in just about any John Hughes movie circa the mid-'80s. 'Pretty in Pink': Today's 'it' bands would fit right in. 'Pretty in Pink': Today's 'it' bands would fit right in.

In fact, I suggested to my dinner companion that there might be a niche market in this: Somebody should create a soundtrack titled "Pretty in Pink 2: The Original Motion Picture Soundtrack to the Movie That Never Got Made." (Same deal with "The Breakfast Club" and "Sixteen Candles.") Of course, in the iTunes Age, the conventional wisdom is that nobody buys albums anymore -- but they do buy compilations. (Witness the continuing global success of the "Now That's What I Call Music!" franchise; the latest U.S. "Now" compilation, the 28th in the series, was released in June and went platinum last month.)

As it happens, my colleague ended up buying "Partie Traumatic," Black Kids' debut CD, on iTunes. He doesn't really read music criticism, so he didn't know -- and wouldn't have cared -- that Rolling Stone and The Guardian loved the record or that Pitchfork hated it. He just really liked the Black Kids song we heard over dinner ("I'm Not Gonna Teach Your Boyfriend How to Dance With You"), got hooked and became a customer.

All of that got me thinking about the economics of music discovery, whether by hearing new music in a restaurant, in a movie theater or on the internet. Speaking of which, the deeply troubled music industry, rather astonishingly, has been spending its summer making it harder for music fans to encounter new music online. Last month, for instance, Muxtape, which I raved about in this column when it launched earlier this year, went dark. Created by former college-radio DJ Justin Ouellette, the hipster favorite made it simple for music fans to create virtual mix tapes -- short lists of songs your friends (and other Muxtape users) could listen to but not download, because Muxtape used streaming technology. (Muxtape, in fact, offered links to Amazon's MP3 store to make it easy for users to buy songs they had just heard.) But now, a simple, sad message appears on the Muxtape home page: "Muxtape will be unavailable for a brief period while we sort out a problem with the RIAA" -- the Recording Industry Association of America. A brief period? We'll see.

Likewise, the hugely popular internet radio station Pandora is "approaching a pull-the-plug kind of decision," as founder Tim Westergren told The Washington Post, because the federal government, prompted by the music industry, doubled the "performance-royalty" rate that internet radio stations must pay (to record companies) to stream music -- twice as much as satellite radio. Traditional terrestrial radio stations, mind you, don't have to pay performance royalties: They pay only publishing royalties to songwriters. The new internet-radio royalty rates kicked in as of July, and they threaten to kill not just Pandora but the rest of the fledgling internet-radio market.

Meanwhile, we're seeing artists and labels pulling music from iTunes in hopes of juicing album sales. Warner, for instance, just pulled Estelle's entire album "Shine" from iTunes because it didn't want fans to be able to buy just its ubiquitous hit single, "American Boy" (featuring Kanye West). It's kind of sweetly principled that Estelle -- and/or the suits at Warner -- think that "Shine" is a complete work of art that must be purchased in its entirety and then presumably listened to from start to finish. Principled but idiotic -- and the proof is that "Shine" and "American Boy" are both now in freefall on the Billboard charts. (Your neighborhood drug dealer wouldn't do so well either if he forced all his customers to buy in bulk.)

All in all, it's been a depressing summer for the delusional record industry. We're seeing a total disconnect between labels' unrealistic, old-school revenue expectations and what the market can bear. On the streaming-music front in particular, the sad reality is that advertising revenue isn't, and may never be, there to fully support the music industry's wishful-thinking profit margins.

As Advertising Age Editor Jonah Bloom said to me last week, labels "can't help looking at what they used to earn from a big band's latest release and wondering why they can't score that. ... The trick is to get your costs in line with your anticipated sales based on current revenue rather than former revenue."

But the music industry, stuck obsessing about exactly that -- former revenue -- would prefer that you only listen to music when and where they want you to. And that's no way to figure out the path to future revenue. In lieu of the usual Media Guy's Pop Pick giveaway, this week I'm randomly giving away one copy each of Black Kids' "Partie Traumatic"; the Virgins' eponymous debut; and, for old times' sake, the "Pretty in Pink" soundtrack. To be eligible, send me an e-mail with "Black Kids" or "The Virgins" or "Pretty in Pink" in the subject line on or before Oct. 8. You must be at least 18 and have a valid U.S. mailing address.

~ Ciao for Niao

Internet does not influence music buying...

Totally wrong! I think this statement is not correct and I think the Pew research study that came up with this statement is skewed. According to my favorite daily reader, Digital Music News, the Pew Internet and American Life Project just released this study. The official statement from Pew is "The internet helps music buyers connect with artists and learn more about music, but it doesn’t strongly influence what or how they buy." I don't possibly see how this can be correct. I, for one am extremely influenced by my interactions on the internet and hearing, or learning of a band in a blog, or in the social networking sphere has led to numerous purchases.

According to this survey of 2400 adults, 56% of those polled use the internet for music research. Much more than the number using it for Cell Phone research and even higher then Real Estate. This to me does not represent a lack of influence in the final purchase. Even if those polled said it didnt make a major difference in their purchase, 22% still made their purchase online. That is not too shabby in the world of eCommerce. If all marketing could bring about purchases from 22% of those who viewed it, the business world would be vastly different than it is today.

This topic coincides with an article I recently read in Billboard touting the fact that MP3 downloads were yet to make a major impact within the industry... Billboard's answer (and I totally agree) is... wait. Give it time... Just like the influence of social networking and internet advertising on purchasing patterns, and the market impact of MP3's, all of these efforts to foree into the realm of digital music are eventually going to produce more results. Rome was not built in a day and neither was digital music! For goodness sake, iTunes is less than 10 years old. Like all new formats, and marketing objectives these things take time and I think we will start to see our internet advertising and promotions pay off in dividends down the road. This study is nothing more than Pew "stirring up the pot."